| 
 
Lord Hawke's XI in New Zealand, 1902/03 
Auckland v Lord Hawke's XI 
Auckland Domain 
19,20,22 December 1902 (3-day match) 
Result: Lord Hawke's XI won by an innings and 129 runs 
Toss: Lord Hawke's XI 
Umpires: JH Watts and F Clayton
 
Close of play:
  Day 1: Lord Hawke's XI 242/7 (Thompson ?*, Stanning ?*)
 Day 2: Lord Hawke's XI 321, Auckland 120 and 31/6 (Clayton 6*)
Lord Hawke's XI 1st innings
*PF Warner            c Neill            b NWB Lusk            34
CJ Burnup                                b Stemson             43
FL Fane                                  b Stemson             82
TL Taylor             c Mason            b Barclay             17
EM Dowson                                b Stemson             34
BJT Bosanquet         c Barclay          b Neill               10
GJ Thompson                              b Stemson              7
J Stanning                               b Stemson             33
PR Johnson            c Robinson         b NWB Lusk            43
AE Leatham                               b NWB Lusk            11
+AD Whatman           not out                                   6
Extras                (w 1)                                     1
Total                 (all out, 91.2 overs)                   321
FoW: 1-61, 2-87, 3-118, 4-209, 5-220,
     6-222, 7-234, 8-281, 9-306, 10-321.
Bowling                      O      M      R      W
Neill                       18      0    102      1
Stemson                     45      7    111      5
NWB Lusk                    10.2    8     48      3
Barclay                     18      0     59      1
Auckland 1st innings
E McCormick                              b Thompson             6
R Neill               c Warner           b Thompson            17
D Clayton             c Burnup           b Dowson              13
*TDB Hay              c Dowson           b Burnup              20
FJ Ohlson                                b Thompson             0
FR Mason              c Thompson         b Burnup              26
HB Lusk               st Whatman         b Bosanquet           10
NWB Lusk              st Whatman         b Bosanquet            6
WI Stemson            c Leatham          b Burnup              10
F Barclay                                b Burnup               7
+W Robinson           not out                                   0
Extras                (b 5)                                     5
Total                 (all out, 59.5 overs)                   120
FoW: 1-6, 2-34, 3-37, 4-37, 5-86,
     6-87, 7-103, 8-104, 9-115, 10-120.
Bowling                      O      M      R      W
Thompson                    20      9     30      3
Dowson                      14      2     34      1
Bosanquet                   15      2     31      2
Burnup                      10.5    4     20      4
Auckland 2nd innings (following on)
E McCormick                              b Bosanquet            9
R Neill                                  b Bosanquet            3
D Clayton             c Stanning         b Dowson              20
*TDB Hay                             c & b Bosanquet            0
FJ Ohlson             run out                                   1
FR Mason              c Johnson          b Dowson               1
HB Lusk               c Thompson         b Dowson               2
NWB Lusk              c Fane             b Dowson              15
WI Stemson            st Whatman         b Bosanquet            5
F Barclay                                b Dowson               1
+W Robinson           not out                                   4
Extras                (b ?, lb ?, w ?, nb ?)                   11
Total                 (all out, 36 overs)                      72
FoW: 1-7, 2-22, 3-22, 4-25, 5-29, 6-31, 7-57, 8-63, 9-66, 10-72.
Bowling                      O      M      R      W
Dowson                      11      4     19      5
Bosanquet                   17      1     35      4
Burnup                       7      2      7      0
Warner                       1      1      0      0
 
-  All sources give Lusk's bowling as shown, but it is unlikely
    to be correct
   
 |